Vietnam’s tobacco control policy is undergoing a crucial shift. Recently, Vietnamese authorities opened a draft amendment to the Tobacco Control Law for public comment. The most noteworthy aspect is the proposed inclusion of a direct ban on e-cigarettes in the legal text, with a planned effective date of 2027. This move is widely interpreted as a systemic upgrade in Vietnam’s regulation of new tobacco products, signifying a transition from management primarily based on administrative notices and departmental documents to a more binding legal framework.
Procedurally, “seeking opinions” does not equate to a final decision, but in Vietnamese legislative practice, clauses that reach the public consultation stage have usually undergone considerable internal discussion. The explicit inclusion of e-cigarettes in the ban and the provision of a relatively clear effective date demonstrate the regulatory authorities’ firm stance on policy direction.
This is not the first time Vietnam has expressed a cautious or even negative stance on e-cigarettes. In recent years, health departments, the education system, and local governments have repeatedly issued warnings or restrictions on e-cigarettes, focusing primarily on management around schools and illegal distribution. However, these measures have largely remained at the administrative level, lacking a unified legal basis, resulting in varying effectiveness.
The proposed amendment to the Tobacco Control Law aims to address this long-standing issue of “fragmented rules” through legislation. Once the e-cigarette ban is formally enshrined in law, it will not only mean clearer regulatory grounds but also provide law enforcement agencies with a clearer basis for penalties, investigations, and judicial application.
According to currently disclosed information, the draft does not focus on technical details or product classification, but rather, starting from the overall goal of tobacco control, includes e-cigarettes alongside traditional tobacco products within a strict control framework. This approach reflects Vietnam’s preference for simplified rules and strengthened enforcement in public policy.
For the market, the 2027 timeframe is particularly crucial. It is neither an immediate “hard stop” nor an indefinite postponement, but rather provides the industry with a clear transition window. This period will be a critical stage for businesses to assess risks and adjust their strategies.
From a regional perspective, Vietnam’s choice is not isolated. In recent years, several Southeast Asian countries have shown a trend towards stricter regulation of e-cigarettes. Many countries have restricted the import, sale, and use of e-cigarettes through administrative bans or enforcement actions. Vietnam’s proposed legislation to establish a ban is considered a formalized response to this regional trend.
However, unlike some countries that have directly implemented comprehensive administrative bans, Vietnam has chosen to first solicit opinions and then gradually advance the legislation, demonstrating a degree of procedural prudence. This approach, on the one hand, helps to gather opinions from different stakeholders, and on the other hand, provides assurance for the stability of policy implementation.
From an industry perspective, a legislative ban often has an impact far beyond the size of a single market. Vietnam is both a consumer market and an important node in the regional trade and manufacturing chain of the global e-cigarette industry. Once the ban takes effect, its impact will spread outward along the supply chain.
Especially in the manufacturing sector, policy signals are often reflected in order structures and cooperation models in advance. For factories undertaking OEM and ODM business, legal changes in target markets directly determine the feasibility of continued production and export.
In this context, factories with multi-market experience and flexible manufacturing capabilities are often better able to cope with policy shifts. VEEHOO, for example, is positioned in the industry not as a single brand operator, but as a manufacturing company focused on OEM and ODM cooperation. When collaborating with clients in different regions, one of its main tasks is to adapt product solutions to the regulatory environment of the target market.
In the OEM model, VEEHOO manufactures according to the client’s specifications, but still needs to verify whether there are explicit bans or restrictions in the target market; in the ODM model, the factory often participates in discussions during the design phase, assisting clients in evaluating the feasibility of different product forms from a regulatory perspective. This proactive compliance consideration is particularly important during periods of increased policy uncertainty.
Vietnam’s plan to enshrine the e-cigarette ban in law also makes “time management” a key concern for the industry. The transition period before 2027 does not mean that policy risks can be ignored; on the contrary, many companies may adjust their strategies in advance during this period to avoid the impact of sudden disruptions in the future.
From a regulatory perspective, Vietnam’s move is primarily based on considerations of public policy consistency. Including e-cigarettes in the Tobacco Control Law means that regulatory authorities hope to avoid regulatory loopholes caused by differences in product forms. From the perspective of legislators, it is better to establish clear boundaries at the legal level than to constantly amend existing rules.
This approach may be more efficient at the implementation level, but it also places higher demands on the industry’s adaptability. Companies are no longer simply facing a single administrative regulation, but need to cope with long-term constraints at the legal level. This change often leads to adjustments in market structure.
For manufacturers, this adjustment is not simply a matter of “withdrawal” or “shifting,” but rather a rebalancing of resource allocation and cooperation directions. Some factories may reduce customized development for specific markets and shift production capacity to regions where policies are relatively clear or permissible.
In practice, VEEHOO typically manages different projects in different countries and regions through internal market segmentation to avoid the impact of policy changes in a single market on overall operations. This approach is essentially a risk diversification strategy, not a value judgment on a particular market.
From a public discussion perspective, Vietnam’s request for public comments also provides a window for various sectors of society to express their views. Health experts, legal professionals, and relevant industry participants all have the opportunity to offer suggestions at this stage. This mechanism helps to expose potential problems and reduce implementation friction before final legislation.
Of course, soliciting opinions does not mean that the policy direction will fundamentally change. Based on the information disclosed so far, incorporating the e-cigarette ban into law has become an important part of the draft amendment. More discussions are likely to focus on implementation details, transitional arrangements, and supporting measures.
Looking at it over a longer timeframe, Vietnam’s action also reflects the global trend of e-cigarette regulation gradually becoming “institutionalized.” Early management methods, mainly based on temporary measures and departmental notices, are being replaced by more systematic legal frameworks. This process is often accompanied by market reshuffling and industrial restructuring.
In this environment, the role of manufacturing companies is also changing. The model of relying solely on a single product or market is becoming riskier; conversely, OEM and ODM factories with diverse cooperation experience and familiarity with different regulatory systems are more likely to maintain stability amidst change.
In its external cooperation, VEEHOO usually emphasizes process compliance and information transparency, rather than the speed of market expansion. This relatively restrained positioning allows it to focus on adjusting strategies rather than passively reacting when faced with tightening policies. This is particularly relevant in the context of increasingly stringent policy environments in Southeast Asia. Returning to the revision of Vietnam’s tobacco control law, its true impact may not only be reflected in the 2027 timeframe, but also in the clear policy direction it establishes for many years to come. Regardless of any minor adjustments to the final text, the regulatory space for e-cigarettes in Vietnam will be significantly tightened.
For the industry, understanding this signal is more important than dwelling on short-term market fluctuations. Proactively assessing risks, adjusting strategies, and improving compliance capabilities may be more practical than waiting for the policy to be finalized.
Overall, Vietnam’s plan to incorporate an e-cigarette ban into its Tobacco Control Law, scheduled to take effect in 2027, is a landmark policy move. It not only reflects a shift in regulatory thinking but also provides the industry with a clear timeline. During this transition period, the interaction between businesses, manufacturers, and regulators will continuously shape the future market landscape. In this process, finding a stable path within the established rules is perhaps the common challenge facing all participants.
Tags: ceramic atomizer core, e-hookah (electronic water pipe), OEM ODM, veehoo vape.